Christopher Hartshorne, printmaker

A Conversation with printmaker Christopher Hartshorne

During the summer of 2025 I participated in a printmaking residency at In Cahoots Residency in Petaluma, California. In residence were three other printmakers and a poet. We got to know each other a little over the two weeks that we shared space in the studio, on outings, at meals. Christopher Hartshorne and I worked directly across from each other, each at a lovely large etching press. Over two weeks I experienced the gift of observing his process of pulling richly beautiful, futuristic moons–a memorable highlight of my own residency experience.

When we noticed the local blackberries were in and ripe, Chris picked a bunch to bake us a blackberry crumble. It was almost as delicious as Chris’ prints.

This conversation took place towards the end of our residency in the etching studio.

Christopher Hartshorne printing the Graphic Myths series

Nanette: How did you come to art?

Chris: I always made art as a kid. I was so shy, I didn’t try other things. Very introverted. It was like an escape, or something that I could do. And I got a lot of positive reinforcement as a kid. I was known as an artist as a kid. So I kind of stuck with it.

Nanette: Like drawing?

Chris: Yes, drawing. I’ve tried to do other things, but I always come back. I’m like, I’m an artist. I’ve got to keep making art.

Nanette: Why printmaking?

Chris: I was painting and I went to school for illustration, never did any printmaking in school, like in college, but when I discovered woodblock printmaking, I liked the process. It was a very definite process. You transfer an image, you carve the image, you print it, you kind of know what it’s going to look like, very graphic. A painting to me was too mysterious. Maybe I didn’t know how to paint. I was a painter, but I didn’t know when a painting was done. There was something really crisp and clear about printmaking and the way I was using it. I latched onto the process immediately. I loved how you could make an expressive, almost random mark on a piece of wood and it looked so defined and intentional when you printed it, because it’s so graphic and bold. That was really cool to me. The marks you can make and how bold they are compared to painting. But now I’m thinking of printmaking differently, actually. A print can be more mysterious, like a painting. So now my views are broadening. That’s how I latched onto printmaking, the process.

Nanette: How long have you been printing then?

Christopher Hartshorne: TempleGRAM, Multiple block woodcut installation, variable dimensions, 2019

Chris: Probably 20 to 25 years. I just started doing it on my own.

Nanette: After school?

Chris: Yes, I was hand pressing, with no community yet. I just started doing it and then kept doing it. I eventually went to grad school for printing, because that’s all I was doing.

Nanette: Many of the artists that I’ve met go in through painting, because painting is seductive and it’s elevated. It used to be, you were a painter or a sculptor. And that’s all there was for fine art. So I think it’s normal to go in through the magic of painting. What grad school did you go to?

Chris: I went to Tyler School of Art.

Nanette: How was your grad school experience?

Chris: It was good. I waited ten years in between BFA and MFA so I was older than everyone. I really wanted to immerse myself in printmaking and school for printmaking, but I actually did not really feel like going back to school. But it was good because they have a program in Rome, through the school, so the whole second year I was in Rome and it was more like a residency, which . . . why am I going to school if I’m just doing an artist residence? But it was really amazing. I would never have gone out of the country back then if it wasn’t for the program. It was my first time out and it was pretty cool. I had a small cohort of five other grad students from Tyler and a bunch of undergrads that were from a lot of different schools, just getting some international school experience. It was good.

I was scared to leave the country. I don’t know. I’m a homebody, but it was really, really amazing for me to leave, and see more than just the art experience.Just to see how other people live, non Americans, [laughs] was very good for me to see as an artist and a human, or an American, I guess, so that was pretty cool.

Nanette: You were in your 30s then?

Chris: I was 30 something.

Nanette: I went to grad school late too. And it was weird to be one of the oldest people. I think I went when I was 38. And they were all so young.

Christopher Hartshorn: Self Guided Tour, Linocut relief print on mulberry paper, 36″ x 24″ 2023

Chris: I feel like I fit in. It was just that I kind of was over school, even though I wanted to go back, if that makes sense. I think if I could have found or put myself into a printmaking community, that would’ve also done the trick, but I needed school to help me with that, too.

Nanette: I think that’s why people go.

You’re originally from?

Chris: I’m from New Jersey. East Coast.

Nanette: Urban?

Chris:  No, it’s actually pretty rural. I grew up in a house that used to be a farm. It’s known as the Garden State, which people who think that New Jersey is just like the waste of New York, are like, the Garden State? That doesn’t sound right, but there are rural areas. I was equidistant from Philadelphia and New York so could go on a trip to either pretty quickly.

Nanette: Did you do that as a young person?

Chris: I did. My parents would take me and there were school trips, and then we would go as teenagers. Now that I live on the West Coast, I’m like, oh my God, that was so close. I could have gone every weekend to New York. Because now Seattle is my New York, Seattle and Vancouver, but they’re so far away. I’m in between them. I miss New York, even though I never lived there. What would have happened if I moved there?

Nanette: What is your work about, historically, when you first started feeling maybe professional or serious? What was your content?

Chris: It was woodcut, woodblock print. They were large scale banners when I first started showing. Very abstract, and I would say. . . That’s a great question. What are they about? Because I feel like I have a lot of answers to that and one of them is, I don’t know. But I think I really wanted to overwhelm the viewer. So there’s lots of swirling energy. I was thinking about how does that connect to nature? Very organic forms. Thinking about microscopic and macroscopic. I made these huge banners with very large shapes, but if you went in really close, there was really tiny marks. So it was playing with scale, big and small in the same piece. 

Christopher Hartshorne: Fusion Field, Woodblock printed public art installation, 2017

I’m drawn to installation. I’m not really satisfied with things I make unless it becomes something bigger. This is kind of a boring answer, but it’s also just about composition. I get a lot of satisfaction composing an image with shapes or stenciling off things and connecting, making things grow. I should show you my non-moon work.

Christopher Hartshorne: Fusion Field, Woodblock printed public art installation, detail, 2017

Nanette: I saw on your website a lot of color. Really intense, vibrant, big shapes.

Chris: A lot of times I make stuff and I think about what it means to me after, because I do a lot of playing or experimenting, and then I start thinking about it more and more as it develops, my abstract stuff anyway.

I think with the color work you saw, I was thinking about maps as I was making it. I didn’t set out to make a map, but I used a system of creating triangular backgrounds in one body of work. Triangles point in directions. They look like they’re symbols or yield signs, so it started feeling like a really bizarre, maybe undecipherable map. Like another language. Even the colors would mean something. It’s cool to have that grow on a wall because someone literally has to travel through the piece. So it becomes a map to them, too, even if they don’t know it.

Nanette: Maps are interesting. I’ve always liked looking at maps, and now with our phones, when we travel, a lot of times I take screenshots of the map. I like to zoom in and out and see where things are.

Chris: I do, too.

Nanette: The narrative of the maps, did you keep that inside internally? Or did you write about that or talk about that at the time?

Chris: I shared it minimally for show statements and artist’s statements. It took so long to create that I started putting elements in consciously thinking about maps while I was making it. It wasn’t just after. I remember putting stripes in that looked like diamond yield signs. You know when you see a road turning, there’s this weird curve. I put some of those in there. I was even thinking of street art or textures.

Nanette: They were directional or alluding to direction?

Chris: Yes.

Nanette: Did you like that? You made a funny face so I’m wondering, did you like those works?

Chris: Oh, yeah. I don’t know why I made a funny face.

Nanette: Maybe it’s all this language running around us.

Chris: Yeah.

Nanette: Right now you’re working on these moons. And they’re kind of maps too, in a different sort of way.

Chris: They could be maps or related to maps. I mean, they’re places. Right? A moon or a planet. I see them as metaphors. If one of them has a chunk taken out of it, that has some type of meaning as opposed to one that’s plummeting through space.

Nanette: Do you know what that meaning is?

Chris: Not exactly. [laughs]

Nanette: What brought you to start making the moon work?

Christopher Hartshorne: Moon1, Woodcut print on mulberry paper, 24″ x 24″ 2025

Chris: I’m not sure. Well, there is the image itself. I’m interested in sci-fi. I was reading some. I’m watching a lot of movies that have sci-fi as almost like a background. It’s a kind of a horrible movie to watch, but Melancholia, where a planet’s going to crash and nobody can do anything. But it’s really about this relationship between these two sisters, and that’s just kind of like a subplot almost. I kind of like having that kind of theme. It could have been a disaster movie where they showed the city burning, but it was not about that. It was about relationships. So I think about that a lot. 

What does this mean or what kind of metaphor could this be for someone’s life. A lot of the moons have pieces missing or are incomplete or have some drama going on, like lava. But I feel like they’re well carved and look detailed, so they’re both dramatic and maybe unstable, but also there is something stable about them because they’re nice and drawn well. You know what I mean? I’m just thinking about this right now actually. I’m like, oh, that’s interesting. Those are two different forces or ideas.

Nanette: And they are smaller than your previous work.

Chris: In my mind, I was making this big. Wouldn’t it be cool to make it for a specific space and just cover the whole wall with moons. It’s almost like a graphic novel, which I’ve also been looking at a lot. . . the narratives in graphic novels.

What would happen if you saw the same circle in different ways? Could I elicit a story out of that? I don’t know. Maybe just not a very specific story, but just a journey.

Nanette: So big moons, a big moon installation. Would those be prints? Would those be woodcuts?

Chris: Yes.

Christopher Hartshorne: Six Moons from Graphic Myths, Woodcut prints on mulberry paper, 24″ x 24″ each, 2025

Nanette: Are you married to woodcut?

Chris: I think I am, and sometimes I ask myself, Why? Because, as I work on these, I’m like, you know what, should this be an etching? I’m trying to get the most detail I can out of a piece of plywood and I could get a lot more detail out of an etching. So that’s been on my mind. Or even wood engraving. To get that detail, I have to work this big, but I could go smaller in a wood engraving. I don’t know. So I feel like I’m married to it and I’m thinking about cheating. Not cheating, because. . . I don’t know.

Nanette: Having an affair?

Chris: Yes. It’s different.

I have done some paintings. Especially when I was thinking more about color, I’m like, I’ll just do a painting. I wanted to put all these colors into a piece so I did a lot of gouache paintings.

Nanette: What’s the scale on those?

Chris: I think the biggest ones are 32 x 40, a big piece of watercolor paper. I’m painting like a printmaker or they look like prints because they’re very graphic, not a lot of blending of the colors. It’s very graphic which is very satisfying. I guess I’m into graphic color and shape. I think I need to think about that more because I do feel like the medium can change based on the idea or what’s best for the idea, you know what I mean, or the outcome.

There’s something about woodcut, I guess. You know, one thing about it is that I don’t need anything, really. I can do it anywhere I want. That has been a big deal. I started doing it with no studio, in my bedroom. So I think I’m still holding on to that.

Nanette: Do you use regular plywood or is it birch plywood?

Chris: It’s birch plywood. I like birch.

Nanette: Does birch have knots?

Chris: Yes, I either incorporate them or try to ignore them, which is hard, because they’re very tough. Birch is hard enough to get detail, but not as hard as some wood. So it’s kind of in between, not as soft as pine, which would just flake away or be too soft.

Nanette: I tried to laser etch some plywood. It was really hard to get an even burn. I don’t know, it was like Home Depot plywood, but if there was a knot, it was just kind of disastrous.

Chris: I did it with plywood. I was at Oregon College of Art at a residency in 2018. I didn’t really make anything. I just went there every day and used their laser cutter. I made 20 wood boxes. It seemed to be fine. I just had to change the setting so it would go deeper. It took two hours for this size. [indicates with hands] I think they were getting annoyed that I was using it so much.

Nanette: You were bogarting that.

Chris: And really putting it to work.

But that’s another thing. Since I’m talking about it. Putting a digital technology with old school printmaking is kind of interesting. I never really explored that, but some of the images actually were created from patterns from white noise screens. So it was kind of like thinking about digital stuff, but making it into a woodcut which I thought was interesting. Taking digital imagery and using digital technology, then printing it old school like.

Nanette: Translating.

Chris: That’s a good word.

Nanette: So you’re not a purist then?

Chris: I don’t think so. I’m still learning about printmaking, actually. I never did any printmaking in undergrad. And even in grad school, you were kind of on your own, like, “Make a big project.” So I didn’t learn everything that I could have about printmaking. I’m still actually learning more things, little things. . . oh, you can do that? So I don’t feel like a purist because I’m just using the knowledge I have and I don’t even think I have all the knowledge to be a purist. I’m not a hardcore printmaker. I’m hardcore woodcut person.

Nanette: It’s interesting because there are these different schools. There are printmakers who embrace all the new technology. Riso is being accepted in the fine art print community. And then there’s some people who are like, oh, my God, you used a laser for that? They don’t accept any technology, or I should say any digital technology. So it’s interesting that there’s that mix.

Chris: I don’t have a problem with that. I guess if it takes away from your brain doing some work, if it’s doing too much work, maybe I don’t know depends on what it is.

Christopher Hartshorne: Asteroid Autopsy, Gouache, 22″ x 30″ 2023

Nanette: You teach as well?

Chris: I teach mostly, drawing and foundations courses, like 2D design, and then about one or two times a year I teach a printmaking or a relief class. It’s fun. Printmaking is harder than just teaching drawing, because there’s all the processes and cleaning is crazy. They really need to clean better. But it keeps me on my toes. It’s keeps me thinking about what I’m making too. They influence me and even the things that I’m showing them, like other artists. It’s also affecting me, my work, so that’s a perk. And I like the kids, too. It’s not all about me.

Nanette: Are they mostly young?

Chris: Yes. They are new art majors, freshmen or sophomores probably.

Nanette: Are you thinking of the next project or the next residency?

Chris: I’m thinking about these moons and how I can make them bigger. So that’s on my mind.

Nanette: Do you do residencies regularly?

Chris: Every couple years. This is the second year in a row at In Cahoots. I did a couple at universities, which was cool because I had more time to take off. It was like six to eight weeks and I really could develop something, not even knowing exactly what it would be, but I knew it was going to be good because that’s a lot of time. I came up with these big installations through residencies. So I guess I would love to do one of those again for a long term project if I could find the time or the right part of the year. It’s interesting how life can get in the way of art.

Nanette: That’s kind of the point. And then all that things that get in the way influence the art and change it.

Is there anything else we should know about you?

Chris: How many hours you got? No. I can’t think of anything. I’m trying to think of a funny anecdote.

Nanette: You’re a cook.

Chris: Well, you’ve seen me make a crumble, but I don’t really cook that much. Only because my partner does. And he’s so good. It’s like, I feel spoiled. But I can cook if I have to.


Christopher Hartshorne received his BFA in Illustration from The Columbus College of Art and Design and his MFA in printmaking from Tyler School of Art in Philadelphia. His woodcuts have been exhibited at The Philadelphia Museum of Art, The William Penn Foundation, The Woodmere Art Museum, The Art Institute of Philadelphia, The Delaware Art Museum, The Romanian Academy in Rome, and The Fleisher Art Memorial Wind Challenge series. He has been a fellow at the Center For Emerging Visual Artists and also with The New Courtland Artist Program. Christopher has taught at the Rhode Island School of Design, Tyler School of Art, and has taught in many public school connected art programs throughout Philadelphia, including The Mural Arts Program, The Arthur Ross Gallery at the University of Pennsylvania, The Print Center and The Philadelphia Museum of Art. He has completed artist residencies at The Oregon College of Art & Craft (2018); The Sylvia J. Smith Artist in Residence at Dickinson College (2019); and at InCahoots (2024, 2025). Christopher currently lives in Bellingham, Washington and teaches at Western Washington University.

christopherhartshorne.com
In Cahoots Residency

This interview was conducted in August 2025 at In Cahoots Residency by Nanette Wylde.

Sophie Loubere, visual artist

A Conversation with printmaker Sophie Loubere

During the summer of 2025 I participated in a printmaking residency at In Cahoots in Petaluma, California. In residence with me were three other printmakers and a poet. We got to know each other a little over the two weeks that we shared space—in the studio, on outings, at meals. Sophie Loubere stood out as an artist deeply invested in the conceptual nature of historical imagery while exploring materials and processes. She moved from working with wood type on a Vandercook to chemical etching to handworking intaglio plates and back again. Always smiling, ready to share knowledge and information, while deeply focused on her tasks at hand. This conversation took place in the etching studio towards the end of our residency.

Sophie Loubere giving a printmaking demonstration at the Bainbridge Island Museum of Art in Washington state. Photo by Laura Zander

Nanette: How did you come to art?

Sophie: I started in elementary school, and it was just something that I was good at. I started using pastels, like chalk pastels, and I was making pastel paintings with those, and I was getting positive responses, and then I just kept on going, and eventually it was just one of those things where it just felt like it was what I needed to do, which I’m sure a lot of artists can relate to.

Nanette: Did you go to art school right after high school?

Sophie: I went to the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, and I was an art major. But while I was there, I was just feeling like the curriculum wasn’t really serving my needs, so I wound up transferring to Rhode Island School Design in their illustration program. I’ve always been interested in words and books and writing as well. So for a while, I thought that I would potentially become an illustrator. But then my interests just wound up being a little too noncommercial, a little too artsy fartsy, more interested in material, more interested in concept, and making artist books as opposed to illustrations for editorial and things like that. 

When I went into the illustration program, I didn’t fully understand that the conventional commercial way of making money doing illustration would be to make illustrations for editorial magazines or for working in animation and designing characters for game studios and things like that, and that just was not really where my interests lay. Then one winter session, I wound up taking a printmaking course, Painterly Prints, and I learned aquatint and monoprinting. 

Sophie Loubere: Relics, Cyanotype, letterpress, archival imagery. Partial view of 20′ x 6′ installation of literary vignettes, cyanotypes, and audio and video based on historical research, 2022

After that I was really into etching. I spent my senior year mostly doing etching projects working on this extended sort of book project. After I graduated, I set up my own studio in Seattle. I was working as a graphic designer and publications manager at a nonprofit art school. I also had a little studio and I wound up getting some grant money so I was able to get a little press and then I basically just explored varieties of ways of doing printmaking. I was feeling a little bit frustrated because I didn’t have a conventional printmaking background because I hadn’t majored in it when I was an undergrad. I was trying to learn from books, YouTube videos. I taught myself how to mezzotint, and eventually I just felt like I needed some more specific background. I applied for grad school. I got into a grad school that had a pretty in-depth printmaking program and that’s where I honed both my practice as well as my printmaking skills.

Sophie Loubere: Relics, detail

Nanette: So you’re primarily a printmaker?

Sophie: At this point, yes. I’m open to making in pretty much any particular way. I have worked with fabrics before. I’ve done installation. I’ve done audio and video work to go along with the prints. But I think that primarily when I’m thinking conceptually, the majority of the time it winds up being a print in some way or other, and print doesn’t necessarily mean something that is like a letterpress print. I also have done things working with cyanotypes and alternative photography. I view those things as prints as well.

In my view, there’s a lot of different meshing that goes on between all these different artistic media. I would say that printmaking falls into a lot of different categories.

Nanette: Are you still making books?

Sophie: I am. The issue with the books is that they take a lot of time and materials. The way that I’m working right now, since I left grad school, I haven’t really had access to papermaking, which is another aspect that I was exploring in school. So in lieu of that, I wound up deciding to experiment and figure out how to dye paper. I’ve gotten cotton papers and I’ve been dyeing them with natural dyes and there’s a lot of experimentation, a lot of failure that goes along with that, and creating a long form book, I think, with that, I have created a book, but it feels like more of a mock up at this point. I think in order to make a full book, I’m going to need access to papermaking resources, access to letterpress studios. 

I have a couple of different books I want to make, but I’m not really feeling like I have access to the facilities I need in order to make them. They kind of feel like projects that I’m always planning in my head. I have materials that I’ve collected, I’ve dyed book cloth that I’m going to make using indigo, and it’s just kind of sitting there waiting for me to make a portfolio box with it at some point here. So, yes, I am still making books, and I would say that even if the prints I’m making are not going into a traditional book form, I am always thinking of them in relationship to each other. When I put them together, I’m thinking of them as a narrative. They all explore some type of creation or visualization. 

Sophie Loubere: Wolves, Coptic stitch bound artist book, bleach linoleum block prints and plate lithographs on paper treated with madder, wattle, & iron. Exterior bookcloth dyed in madder and wattle and treated with iron and beeswax. 8.5″ x 7.5″ x .5″ closed, 8.5″ x 15″ x .5″ open, 2025

I work a lot with like archival imagery. I try to think of different ways of telling the same story or thinking about different ways of viewing things through a certain perspective. For example, I might take an archival image that I found on the Internet that was taken by a photographer in the 1800s, and then do a reprint of that on expired photo paper, and then I will solarize it and do all sorts of things, just the expired paper on its own will slightly abstract this image and shift how viewers see whatever that image is showing. Then I might take that image, scan it and then make a stone lithograph from it. Then I also might take that image that I’ve scanned and make a relief plate from that and have a piece of paper that I’ve dyed using madder and iron, and it’s really deep dark purple, and then take that piece of paper and put bleach on the lino, and then you get a completely different image based on what is pulled out from the bleach versus what is on the stone, versus what is in the photograph, versus what is in the original slide.

Nanette: It sounds like you’re really interested in materials and processes.

Sophie: Yes.

Sophie Loubere: High Rocks Mining District, Dale Creek Canyon, Stone lithograph & bleach monoprint on paper treated with madder, wattle, & iron. Photograph by Andrew J. Russell, archived & scanned by the OCMA.10″ x 11″ varied edition of 8, 2025

Nanette: I’ve noticed, here, you’re working on three different projects during your residency?

Sophie: Mostly it’s two. I just wanted to finish one set of prints that I’m putting into a show. Partly what is informed what I’m doing here also is that I have this show coming up and I wasn’t quite able to finish before traveling here.

I did a pop up studio at Bainbridge Island Museum of Art where I was working with wood type and I was really enjoying the immediacy of that. The work I do is planned and goes through a series of stages. I really put everything through the ringer. It has different times where it exists in certain ways. I think that development helps to add depth to the imagery and grows the imagery in particular ways, and also mimics time and the depth of the narratives I’m working with.

But it’s fun to have these more immediate ways of working, using wood type. Somebody’s already created these. They have their own histories as well. Who knows how many different things these letters have said over the years. It’s rewarding to be able to take those pieces and put them together in particular ways and, after a day, have a brand new print. That is another really interesting way of working and it adds a certain spontaneity that I might not get in my other work.

Sophie Loubere: Salt Lake from Trestle Work, Stone lithograph & bleach monoprint on paper treated with madder, wattle, & iron. This is the front and back of the same print. Photograph by Andrew J. Russell, archived & scanned by the OCMA. 10″ x 12″ each, varied edition of 8, 2025

One of the things about my practice is that one of the reasons I do a bunch of different things is because I just get interested in a bunch of different stuff and I like to explore a bunch of different stuff. If I’m doing the same thing over and over and over again, I start to get a little stir crazy. Being able to add this sort of thing to my practice, first of all, it potentially makes imagery that I can sell for a little bit more cheaply. I know that that’s not necessarily something everybody wants to hear from an artist, but the truth of the matter is that a lot of the stuff that I’m making because it’s such a time intensive process, it’s hard to price it at super cheap prices like $50 or whatever, but a letter press print, I could easily see selling it for 30, 40, 50 bucks or something like that.

I was just interested in expanding and growing my practice. I have experience as a graphic designer. I worked for a while in house and I also have done freelance projects and everything. So I really enjoy working with type. I also enjoy writing. It’s just another way of expanding on all of that, I guess.

Nanette: The Ultraviolet Evening print, is this a reference to Andy Warhol?

Sophie: Did he do something with that?

Nanette: I think Ultraviolet is associated with Warhol, or Lou Reed. That’s what my memory says. She was an actress or model.

Sophie: Oh, might be. Yeah, it sounds like something to do with Lou Reed.

Nanette: They were connected back in the beginning times.

Sophie Loubere: Ultraviolet Evening, Wood type letterpress print
15″ x 22″, varied edition of 12, 2025

Sophie: That is true. The beginning times. Actually, this is the third in a series, the three prints I’ve been making while I’ve been here, that all are 11 by 22. I was using these two type faces together. They can either exist on their own or they come together and create a poem. So this is the last one, and the poem moves through parts of the day. The first one is vibrating and green. The second one is sunset golds, golden hour. This last one I was thinking of that time of day when you go out and the sun has just set and the sky is that really vibrant, sort of periwinkle color, and also, ultraviolet. Part of me always thinks of ultra violent. There’s just something interesting to me about the way words can change. It’s also true that when I was in high school, I really, really liked the color purple, and my mother always went and did Friday Night protests against the Iraq War on the street corner. She had a poster board that she wrote that said, “Stop the cycle of violence.” And I thought it said, “Stop the cycle of violet.” I thought she was making fun of me because I had painted my entire room purple.

Nanette: That’s so funny.

Sophie: I guess I’m interested in words and imagery with words and illustrating things with words. Letterpress and wood type allow me to do that in a really spontaneous way that doesn’t come into the rest of my practice. This residency has allowed me the opportunity to play with that. Once I get home I might be able to explore more of this.

Nanette: I’ve noticed your etchings look very nature inspired. Do you want to tell me about that?

Sophie: Sure. I have a plate that is 9 by 12 that I made and I wanted to make a smaller, sister plate to that. One of the things I’m interested in is having something to respond to, to discuss the idea of nature in relationship to a lot of the other imagery I’m working with, because a lot of the imagery I’m working with right now and have been for the last few years, has been this specific set of glass plates taken by Andrew J. Russell in the 1870s. A lot of the plates he took were out in the American West before the railroads really started to bring a lot of the settler colonialism out. The imagery is a lot of big open spaces, and the humans are all these little tiny specks. You have these big open fields, big hills, giant rocks, and interesting landscape, and then these train tracks that are being built. He was part of the original geological team that went out and figured out whether or not Yellowstone was a place of interest. Because of that documentation, Yellowstone become the first national park.

Sophie Loubere: Tresspasses at Tandem Press, The Poisonous Calm, Found furniture and rocks, silverprint photographs, found audio. 54′ x 30′ installation, 2023

I’ve been using these glass plates, and there’s very specific imagery in these glass plates, too, and they’re also from one person’s perspective. However, there was also a painter, Thomas Moran, that went with them, and he made sketches. These sketches became monumental paintings when he returned home. These paintings of Yellowstone that he created were amalgamations of his sketches and an artist idealized creation of real spaces. While they might be called “Mammoth Hot Springs”, the pieces painted are a collage of his sketches from a variety of areas. So they’re this really romanticized view of what was happening out there. I’m a little bit obsessed with grass, so these plates are these romantic ideals of close ups of grass, especially in relationship to these glass plates, which are really much more pulled out, panned out imagery, and they’re also created by the human hand.

Nanette: You’re getting to work with the original glass plates?

Sophie: No. They’ve all been scanned at super high resolution by Oakland Museum of California and they’re all online. I was able to download and look through them. There’s over 600 of them. It’s pretty incredible. They’re super high res. But I have not actually seen the original glass plates.

Nanette: It seems like the content that you’re interested in is really about the relationships between history and the documentation of natural spaces or documentation of the land.

Sophie: That’s definitely part of it. There’s another part of the work where I go into archives. I do research and find stories. Then I take those stories and rewrite them. Obviously it’s all through my particular lens, but if I’m finding stories about specific people, I try to find the first person documentation of whatever that history is. Then I take those stories and I rewrite them into these 300 to 700 words little vignettes. These come together as literary essays.

Sophie Loubere: Trespasses Ultraviolet Evening, Found objects, five channel archival audio & video, video shot on site by artist, 54′ x 30′ installation, 2023. This photograph documents a video installation made up of archival footage and video recorded on site. I also placed 5 speakers throughout and created 5 channels of audio of archival audio, including a speaker in the belly of the clock that ticked constantly, then chimed midnight. The archival footage here is from the nuclear tests of Operation Upshot-Knothole in 1953. The audio is a sermon given in the 1970s by Kathryn Kuhlman, an early harbinger of the charismatic Christian movement.

For my thesis show, which was a big installation in a 34 by 50 foot warehouse. I had ten of these vignettes that I printed using photo litho plates on 18 by 24 inch handmade paper. The stories would range from the great fire of 1910, to an Apache horse heist in San Antonio in the 1700s, to the atomic bomb tests at Frenchman Flat in the mid 20th century, to the formation of the Permian basin in Texas 600 million years ago. It goes all over the place. That show was called Trespasses. It was really about human interaction with natural spaces.

I wound up collecting some rocks from the Great Salt Lake region that were 60 million years old. They were part of the installation.

Nanette: Was it legal to take them?  

Sophie: It wasn’t at a national park. I didn’t see any signs around saying I couldn’t do it. [laughs] It’s really about human interaction with natural spaces and nature and just thinking about how we have existed in all of these different time periods and the similarities between those things.

Sophie Loubere: Twelve House

Nanette: We? Do you mean humans?

Sophie: Humans and how we have existed and what ways in which we’ve existed. Thinking about how when we were settling/invading the West, the government just had people going out, and they were on their own. It was how America became America to a degree. The values behind it was part of what was going on with the research for that show, thinking about how and why we are the way we are. There’s still a lot of interesting things I want to look at in that research.

I’ve been doing a lot of research into Mormonism thinking about cults and the way we worship celebrity and things like that.

Nanette: Did you read Under the Banner of Heaven?

Sophie: I watched the show, that was pretty dark.

Nanette: That’s just one little story, but it does tell the history of the Mormon religion.

Sophie: I’ve read some, and I actually listened to a lot of audio books and one of them was about the forming of Mormonism in Illinois and how they had like were basically run off of all of these different places. It’s really interesting and also just such a deeply American religion. They believe that they will become gods at some point.

Nanette: And that the relationship with God is a very personal, one-on-one thing

You have a show coming up and what’s the title of that?

Sophie Loubere: The Tall Grass, Madder and Wattle, Bleach monoprint & aquatint, soft ground, and hard ground etching on paper treated with madder, wattle, & iron. 11″ x 14″ each, 1–4 in a varied edition of 20, 2024

Sophie: It’s not a solo show. It’s part of a group exhibition of artists in Port Townsend. It’s called The Showcase.

The body work I’m working on right now with dyed paper, I am calling On the horizon, in the air, because I’m looking at a lot of far away horizons, pulling clouds and highlights out using bleach. I have this interplay between the dyed paper, which is dyed using natural dyes like madder and wattle, and then the bleach, which is really caustic. If I let it sit in the paper enough, it will eat the paper.

Nanette: You’re using wattle and madder, and madder is red?

Sophie: Madder is red. Wattle is a tannin, which helps they dye adhere. There are many different types of tannins, but this one adds a beige pink tone that shifts the vibrancy of madder’s red.

First I take the paper and put it in aluminum acetate for a couple of days in water and then that goes into the madder and wattle and that goes into, I have to put immersion heaters into the tray with the water and it gets up to like 200, 250 degrees and it’s in there for an hour, hour and a half and then right after that is when I have to bleach it. If I let it sit, the bleach won’t be able to pull out the pigment anymore.

Sophie Loubere: Process of making On the Horizon, In the Air

Nanette: So you’re preparing for an exhibition now. What do you think is going to happen after that? What do you have in mind?

Sophie: I’ve done all these prints, I’d like to try to get a shop set up on my website and see what happens with that. I currently am not teaching at a university this year, so my time is a bit more open, so I’m probably going to try to explore a little bit more of the business aspect of being an artist and see how that potentially works as well as trying to do some teaching locally. Weekend workshops with kids or whatever. Then if it feels like this is going to be something that is useful, I might try and do some more wood type things at places close to home. Mostly I’m going to try to keep exploring the body of work I’m doing now because it feels like I’m getting to it. I’ve been doing this for a year, a year and a half working with these materials and it feels like I’m starting to get to a place where I’m really understanding it.

I also recently built some screens so I can add screenprinting as another part of what I’m doing. I’m also probably going to start to do some tone cyanotypes and play around with that a little bit too, because I have a UV box that I’ve built. Just keep exploring the studio processes. I guess I’m kind of all over the place, but, you know, I’m living in a beautiful area. I have a supportive family and even though the world seems absolutely wild, I feel pretty lucky in a lot of ways.


Sophie Loubere is an interdisciplinary artist and educator located in the Puget Sound region. Her work is rooted in research and focuses on printmaking, handmade paper, and alternative photography. Loubere earned an MFA in Printmaking at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a BFA in Illustration at the Rhode Island School of Design.

sophieloubere.com
In Cahoots Residency

This interview was conducted by Nanette Wylde in August 2025 at In Cahoots Residency.